Request Expert

Expert is an attorney, expert witness and legal fee consultant who has personally reviewed and audited nearly $1 billion in law firm billings over the past decade. Many of the world's leading law firms turn to Expert for his clear, concise and effective trial testimony and expert fee analysis.

Expert has testified in over 45 lawsuits, including disputes in federal district courts, California trial courts, JAMS/AAA arbitration, the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals, State Bar courts, and attorney-client fee arbitration. He has qualified to testify and has testified live at trials and arbitration as a designated attorney fee expert

Expert methodology for reviewing, auditing and evaluating legal invoices has been cited, approved and adopted by state and federal courts.

He has been retained as a testifying attorney fee expert by the world’s largest law firms, including Reed Smith, McDermott Will and Emery, Jones Day, Sheppard Mullin, Sidely Austin, Dykema Gossett, Orrick Herrington & Sutcliffe, and Littler Mendelson, among many others. Expert is a member of the California State Bar and is unique among fee experts in that he was a trial attorney for more than a decade at two of the world’s largest law firms (Akin Gump and K&L Gates). Expert has managed a multi-billion dollar litigation portfolio and has audited hundreds of millions of dollars in legal fees from law firms nationwide since 2008. He is a California State Bar-approved continuing legal education instructor on attorneys’ fees who has trained hundreds of executives and in-house counsel from a host of Fortune 500 corporations

Expert is also qualified as an attorney-client fee dispute arbitrator with the California State Bar’s Mandatory Fee Arbitration program and as a judge pro tem with the California Superior Court for the County of Los Angeles.

Expert was the testifying fee expert on a series of fee applications by class counsel in Jones v. Wells Fargo, on behalf of aggrieved California consumers in the first consumer class action brought under the Unruh Act. Relying upon his testimony regarding the reasonableness of hourly rates and overall work performed, the trial court awarded more than $25 million in attorneys' fees to class counsel.The district court for the Central District of California adopted and approved Expert's methodology for identifying and quantifying block-billed, vague and redacted billing entries and slashed Plaintiff's total fee request by more than sixty percent in CNS v. Planet. In this First Amendment dispute, Plaintiff sought more than $4.8 million in attorneys fees, claiming more than 11,000 hours of billable work over five years of litigation. His expert analysis allowed the trial court to clearly identify and quantify the vague, redacted and block-billed time entries, and apply Expert's recommended discounts of $708,682.39 for block billing and $186,189.62 to vague and redacted entries. The trial court further eliminated more than 1,300 claimed hours of work identified by Expert as duplicate and non-compensable. The trial court reduced Plaintiff's fee request in a FEHA action by over $1 million based upon his expert attorney fee testimony. Plaintiff moved for an award of $(Undisclosed) in attorneys' fees, which the trial court reduced. Expert's testimony showed that the hourly rates claimed by Plaintiff's counsel were unreasonable under the circumstances, that excessive time was spent on inter-office communications, and that the matter was overstaffed.