Request Expert

Expert has demonstrated vulnerabilities on a number of access control and biometrics systems, locks, tags, and seals. He understands design flaws and potential attacks, can recommend practical countermeasures, and is knowledgeable about the vulnerabilities demonstrated by others as a result of his work as a vulnerability assessor at Argonne National Laboratory and Los Alamos National Laboratory, and has CEO of (Undisclosed) Security. He understands air freight security issues as a result of his research and published papers on tamper-indicating seals, cargo security, the insider threat, and vulnerabilities associated with physical security devices, systems, and programs. He has considerable experience in the field observing cargo security operations. Expert has demonstrated many vulnerabilities and design flaws in a wide range of biometric access control devices and systems as a vulnerability assessor at Argonne National Laboratory and at Los Alamos National Laboratory. He has devised a number of practical countermeasures.

He has demonstrated many vulnerabilities and design flaws in a wide range of biometric access control devices and systems as a vulnerability assessor at Argonne National Laboratory and at Los Alamos National Laboratory. He has devised a number of practical countermeasures. He has hands-on expertise in cargo security, GPS cargo tracking, RFIDs, and tamper-indicating seals as a result of his work as a vulnerability assessor at Argonne National Laboratory and at Los Alamos National Laboratory. He has served as an expert witness on litigation involving cargo theft. He is a noted expert, frequent invited speaker (including at cyber security conferences), and vulnerability assessor for physical security devices, systems, programs, and strategies. Expert has conducted a variety of different research on product anti-counterfeiting tags and strategies, and is a published author in this area. He is frequently an invited speaker at pharmaceutical companies, associations, and brand integrity conferences.

He understands freight security issues as a result of his research and published papers on tamper-indicating seals, cargo security, the insider threat, and vulnerabilities associated with physical security devices, systems, and programs. He has also considerable experience in the field observing and evaluating cargo security procedures, and has often served as an invited speaker at cargo security conferences. As head of the Vulnerability Assessment Team at Argonne National Laboratory (and formerly at Los Alamos), he has studied and demonstrated vulnerabilities in a wide variety of different electronic security devices and systems, and recommended effective use protocols, training, and countermeasures. He and his colleague were the first to demonstrate (2002) the ease with which GPS can be spoofed (not just jammed or blocked), and the first to recommend countermeasures.

Expert has considerable expertise in cargo security issues, including tamper-indicating seals, GPS tracking, RFIDs, and other physical security devices as a result of his vulnerability assessments at Argonne National Laboratory and at Los Alamos National Laboratory. He has served as an expert witness for cargo theft litigate and for warehouse theft litigation. He has conducted research and vulnerability assessments on a wide variety of physical intrusion detection devices and systems, and understands the physics behind them.

Expert understands marine cargo security issues as a result of his research and published papers on tamper-indicating seals, cargo security, the insider threat, and vulnerabilities associated with physical security devices, systems, and programs. He also has considerable experience observing port and cargo security operations. He has been a long-time critic (in published papers and invited talks at security conferences) of traditional approaches to security auditing, and has proposed improvements and alternatives. Expert has been a long-time critic (in published papers and invited talks at security conferences) of traditional approaches to physical security risk characterization, and has proposed improvements and alternatives.

He has been a long-time critic (in published papers and invited talks at security conferences) of traditional approaches to physical security and risk management, and has proposed improvements and alternatives. Expert is a noted expert on tamper-indicating seals, devices, and enclosures, having conducted vulnerability assessments on a factor of 10 more tampering-indicating devices and enclosures than anybody else in the world. He also has numerous patents and published papers in this area. He is a noted expert on tamper-indicating seals and tamper-evident packaging, having conducted vulnerability assessments on a factor of 10 more tamper-indicating devices and containers than anybody else in the world. He also has numerous patents and published papers in this area.

Expert is an internationally recognized expert on tamper-indicating seals, having conducted vulnerability assessments on a factor of 10 more seals and tamper-evident enclosures than anybody else in the world. He also has numerous patents and published papers in this area. He understands trucking freight security as a result of his research, vulnerability assessments, and published papers on tamper-indicating seals, cargo security, the insider threat, GPS tracking, RFIDs, and other physical security devices, systems, and programs. He has observed and critiqued cargo security operations. He has conducted or directed over 1000 vulnerability assessments on a wide variety of physical security and nuclear safeguards devices, systems, and programs. He has also served as on expert witness on vulnerability assessment issues, and has published extensively (including in peer-reviewed journals) on vulnerability assessment techniques.

Expert has considerable experience in comparing security and technical products, conducting market analyses, and suggesting design and use protocol improvements.

Was an expert witness for litigation involving cargo theft. His testimony helped to settle the case when he was able to argue that high-tech security devices would probably not have prevented the theft.Helped a U.S. government agency improve its critical cargo security program by demonstrating vulnerabilities, and recommended improved security procedures and training.Helped a private company by analyzing its new security product to determine the level of security it provides. He also offered suggestions for improving the design and use protocols.Helped a company trying to enter the security market for the first time to better understand the security industry, security end-users, and how the company's potential product would fit in the market.Helped a private company understand its product counterfeiting vulnerabilities, candidate anti-counterfeiting technologies, and optimum approach to dealing with counterfeiting.Assisted university researchers in understanding potential applications, users, funding sources, and marketing potential of their new technology. He also assisted in identifying new R&D work that was needed, and helped to write technical papers.